Legal Opinion
City of New York v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 10, 1931PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcAvoy, J.
The first of the causes above entitled is an action by the city of New York, acting through the Transit Commission. *235It was commenced on February 14, 1928. In the declaration of its complaint it was asserted that the Interborough Company was operating the subway and elevated railway lines in the city of New York and that the subway is owned by the city and operated under a contract known as contract No. 3, and that the elevated lines are operated under a so-denominated elevated extension certificate issued by the city of New York to the Interborough Company, pursuant to the Rapid Transit Act…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gilchrist v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- People Ex Rel. City of New York v. . NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Matter of Dry Dock, E.B. B.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lowe v. FeldmanNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Radio Common Carriers of New York, Inc. v. New York State Public Service CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Bank of New York v. Public National Bank & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1948
- Rosenfeld Realty Co. v. Cadence Industries Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1973
- Asociación de Dueños de Casas Veraniegas de la Parguera v. Comisión de Servicio PúblicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.