Legal Opinion

United States v. Jarvison

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 23, 2005No. 04-2093PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

In this interlocutory appeal involving a claim that the defendant, Ben Jarvison, is not validly married, the United States contests the district court’s exclusion of testimony on the basis of the spousal testimonial privilege. As part of' the underlying child sexual abuse prosecution, the United States sought to compel the testimony of Esther Jarvison who they contend observed the abuse and could testify as to statements concerning the abuse made to her by both the defendant Ben Jarvison and the alleged victim. After determining that the Jarvisons had a valid marriage,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. VazquezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Apollo Energies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  3. Andrews v. HollowayDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
  4. United States v. ChavezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. RobersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API