Legal Opinion

J. D. Adams Co. v. Dor Township

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 10, 1941No. 35,113PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This was originally an action in replevin, and in the alternative for the value of the property and for damages for wrongful detention. The issues were subsequently broadened, as will presently appear. Judgment was for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

The subject of replevin was a road grader. The defendant township obtained possession thereof from plaintiff under a written contract denominated a “lease contract,” which was made a part of plaintiff’s petition. The contract was executed November 2, 1937. The term was for twenty-four months,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chapman v. County of DouglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Brown v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  3. Salt Creek Township v. King Iron Bridge & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  4. Shaw v. Board of EducationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
  5. City of Bardwell v. Southern Engine & Boiler WorksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Unified School District No. 207 v. Northland National BankCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
  2. Paul v. Topeka Township Sewage District No. 2Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API