Legal Opinion
Gramercy Holdings LLC v. Borozan
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided November 10, 2021No. 8:21-cv-00932Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION GRAMERCY HOLDINGS LLC, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 8:21-cv-0932-KKM-AAS DAVID BOROZAN, NISCHAL PAHARL, and D&N VENTURES LLC, Defendants. ORDER Defendants move to dismiss two Counts of Plaintiff Gramercy Holdings LLC’s Amended Complaint. (Doc. 26.) Defendants allege that Counts III and IV, state law claims for tortious interferences and violations of Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA) are preempted because they arise from Defendants’ good faith assertion of patent rights. Independent of preemption,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pielage v. McConnellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Nicholas La Grasta, Domenico La Grasta, and Mauro La Grasta, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. First Union Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.