Ex Parte Love
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This Court granted certiorari to determine whether the Court of Criminal Appeals was correct in approving the admissibility of a blood sample taken from the petitioner while he was not under arrest. Concluding that Code of 1975, § 32-5-190 et seq., does not provide the "exclusive means for admitting blood alcohol test results," that court held that such test results were admissible as evidence "when there is probable cause to believe the motorist was driving while intoxicated and exigent circumstances are present," even though the motorist was not lawfully arrested. 513 So.2d 19.
The facts are…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ex Parte StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- Ex Parte MelofSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Hays v. City of JacksonvilleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
- Bedingfield v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.