Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Love

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 5, 1987No. 86-128PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This Court granted certiorari to determine whether the Court of Criminal Appeals was correct in approving the admissibility of a blood sample taken from the petitioner while he was not under arrest. Concluding that Code of 1975, § 32-5-190 et seq., does not provide the "exclusive means for admitting blood alcohol test results," that court held that such test results were admissible as evidence "when there is probable cause to believe the motorist was driving while intoxicated and exigent circumstances are present," even though the motorist was not lawfully arrested. 513 So.2d 19.

The facts are…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ex Parte StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  3. Ex Parte MelofSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Hays v. City of JacksonvilleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  5. Bedingfield v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API