State v. Chase
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
POMEROY, Justice.
This appeal, one of several recently before us as a result of an alleged escape from furlough, must be sustained.
A trial upon an indictment alleging violation of 34 M.R.S.A. § 527 (escape from furlough) resulted in a verdict of guilty.
Judgment was entered on the verdict.
This appeal seasonably followed.
The appellant attacks the sufficiency of the indictment for substantially the same reasons asserted in State v. Holbrook, Me., 318 A.2d 62 (1974).
State v. Stewart, Me., 330 A.2d 800 (1975), and the Holbroo k—Merritt—Walk er trilogy, adequately dispose of that issue unfavorably…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Groesbeck v. SeeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Steel v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- State v. CoutureSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1960
- State v. HolbrookSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- Knox Lime Co. v. Maine State Highway CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State of Maine v. AdamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
- Tiemann v. Santarelli Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- State v. HunnewellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
- Reardon v. LarkinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010