Legal Opinion

Branan & Schmitz Realty, Inc. v. Ballard

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 9, 1968No. 43413Published

1Opinion of the Court

117 Ga. App. 758 (1968)

162 S.E.2d 16

BRANAN & SCHMITZ REALTY, INC.

v.

BALLARD.

43413.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Submitted February 6, 1968.

Decided May 9, 1968.

Hansell, Post, Brandon & Dorsey, Gary W. Hatch, for appellant.

Jones, Bird & Howell, C. Dale Harman, for appellee.

BELL, Presiding Judge.

A contract for the sale of realty must expressly state the consideration or it must furnish a key by which the amount and terms of the purchase price can be ascertained; if the contract furnishes a key to the details of the consideration, that is sufficient. Muller v. Cooper, 165 Ga. 439, 442 (141 SE 300).…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. F & C INVESTMENT COMPANY v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  2. Trust Co. v. NealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Muller v. CooperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  4. Massell Realty Co. v. HanburySupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  5. Morgan v. HemphillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API