Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1916No. 12964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Sullivan, J., entered January 20, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

Plaintiff in this, an action for personal injuries, was required, on defendant’s demand, to furnish a bond for *234costs, pursuant to Rem. 1915 Code, § 495. He secured a verdict. Judgment was entered thereon. Defendant appealed. The notice of appeal was served upon plaintiff, but not upon the surety in his costs bond. For this reason, plaintiff has moved that the appeal be dismissed, citing our recent decision in Shippen v. Shippen, 91 Wash. 610, 158 Pac. 247. In that case we held that, since by the act of 1909, Rem. 1915 Code, § 496, the legislature provided that, when a judgment shall be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cline v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Carstens v. GustinWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Long Bell Lumber Co. v. GastonWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Shippen v. ShippenWashington Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zuhn v. HorstWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Gardner v. FrederickWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Talkington v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API