Legal Opinion
Gilmore v. Herrick
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio
Decided April 13, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions
On Motion to Remand.
1Opinion of the Court
TAFT, Circuit Judge.
This is a motion to remand. The suit was filed in the common pleas court of Lucas county against receivers managing a railroad under orders of this court, to recover damages' in the sum of §1,995 for negligence in their operation of the road, resulting in plaintiff’s injury. By virtue of section 3 of the jurisdiction act of August 13,1888, suits of this character may be brought against such receivers without previous leave of the court. It is conceded by the counsel for (he plaintiff that such a suit is one arising under the constitution and laws of the United states, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tennessee v. Union & Planters' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- White v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Compton v. JesupCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- Central Trust Co. v. East Tennessee, V. & G. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marrs v. FeltonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1900
- Pendleton v. LutzMississippi Supreme Court · 1900
- Tompkins v. MacLeodU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1899
- Barnette v. Wells Fargo Nevada National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Barnette v. Wells Fargo Nevada National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926