Legal Opinion

State v. Kizekai

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 19, 2011No. 2009-211-C.APublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice INDEGLIA, for the Court.

The defendant, Memeh Kizekai (defendant or Kizekai), appeals from a judgment of conviction in Superior Court. He contends that the trial justice erred by denying his motion for a new trial because, as Kizekai maintains, the testimony of a state witness was not credible, and the state failed to present sufficient evidence to support his conviction. The defendant’s appeal came before this Court, sitting for oral argument at Classical High School, on April 5, 2011, pursuant to an order directing the parties to show cause why the issues raised in this appeal…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. BanachSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  2. State v. MattatallSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
  3. United States v. Joseph Baldamar CisnerosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  4. State v. TexieiraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  5. State v. GuerraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. RosarioSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  2. State v. Ricardo FlorezSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016
  3. State v. Darnell HieSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014
  4. STATE v. Ramon VIROLASupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2015
  5. State v. Alicia WilliamsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API