Legal Opinion
Reichman v. Bureau of Affirmative Action
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 29, 1982No. Civ. A. 78-767PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HERMAN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Ruth Reichman, initiated this action against Defendants alleging employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex and religion. Specifically, she claimed that the actions, policies and practices of the Defendants violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-5 and her constitutional rights as secured by 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981,
1983, 1985(3) and 1986. In addition, she alleged pendent state claims for defamation and violation of her rights under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, 43 P.S. §§ 951-963.…
2Cases cited88 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Satterwhite v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Sunward Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Bunch v. Artec International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Ernest Dillon v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Miller v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.