Legal Opinion
Allstate Insurance Co. v. Durham
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 14, 2003No. 5D02-2329PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMonaco, J.
Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”), appeals the granting of a final summary judgment in favor of the appel-lees, Georgia Durham and Darrell J. Durham (the “Durhams”), determining that the appellees were entitled to uninsured motorist coverage. Under the peculiar facts of this case, we hold that the Durhams had rejected such coverage and that the judgment should, therefore, be reversed.
According to a “Joint Stipulation of Facts” filed by the parties, Allstate first issued a policy of automobile insurance to the Durhams in 1988. The original policy period was for six months, and the policy…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sentry Ins. a Mut. Co. v. McGowanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Gasch v. HarrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Allstate Insurance v. AshleyDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1993
- Government Employees Ins. Co. v. StafstromDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. HildDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sommerville v. Allstate Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Dodd v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
- Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Russell Brent Musgrove, Jr.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017