Legal Opinion
Newby v. Enron Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 2, 2008No. 06-20658UnpublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: **
In this case, we review the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of the Plaintiffs-Appellants’ claims for failure to timely effect service of process, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). For the following reasons, we AFFIRM the district court’s ruling.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On February 11, 2003, Lila Ward filed a shareholders’ class action suit (“the Ward case”) against Stanley Horton, Dana Gibbs, Lawrence Clayton, Jr., Kenneth Lay, and Arthur Andersen, L.L.P. (“Defendants-Appellees”), alleging violations of the Private Securities Litigation…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Willie E. BOAZMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ECONOMICS LABORATORY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Thompson v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Winters v. Teledyne Movible Offshore, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Robert Norlock v. City of GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Sealed v. SealedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Brandon Thrasher v. Amarillo Police DeptCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Millan v. USAA General Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Robinson v. G D C, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
- Aples v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational TrustDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
- Baptiste v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2024
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.