Legal Opinion

Wright v. Yust

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 6, 1948No. 15,841PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard

In an action begun May 14, 1945, by plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, against defendants in error, for adjudication of rights to real property in the City and County of Denver, described as lots one to fifteen, and lots sixteen to thirty, both inclusive, block thirty-seven, Malone and DuBois Subdivision, defendant Yust enjoyed favorable findings and judgment. Defendant in error Finnerty has not appeared, nor is she interested in the property involved.

It appears that in 1929, plaintiffs were the fee owners of the property involved, then, and hitherto, vacant and unoccupied; that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark v. DuncansonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. De Foresta v. GastSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  3. Crisman v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  4. Sullivan v. CollinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  5. Phillips v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lake Canal Reservoir Co. v. BeetheSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  2. Appel v. Steamboat Ski Corp. (In Re Smythe)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1983
  3. In Re SmytheDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1983
  4. Sandstrom v. SolenColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Sandstrom v. SolenColorado Court of Appeals · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API