Legal Opinion

Phillips v. City & County of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 16, 1946No. 15,505PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

These parties appear here in the same order as in the trial court and are hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, Denver and interveners, respectively.

Plaintiff, fee owner of certain lots in the city of Denver, brought this action August 10, 1943, to set aside a tax deed to Denver, which meanwhile had deeded to interveners. Answers were filed and all facts essential to judgment for plaintiff were stipulated save the amount which he should pay interveners. That sum being fixed by the court judgment was entered accordingly. To review that judgment plaintiff prosecutes this writ, contending: 1.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bogue v. MilesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  2. Central Realty Co. v. FrostSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lake Canal Reservoir Co. v. BeetheSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  2. Wright v. YustSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  3. Sandstrom v. SolenColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Sandstrom v. SolenColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Sandstrom v. SolenColorado Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API