Legal Opinion

Waller v. O'Rear

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 30, 1971No. 5076Published

1Opinion

OPINION ON APPELLEE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellees contend in their Motion for Rehearing that Appellant did not exercise due diligence to secure a statement of facts because she did not try to get an agreement with opposing counsel for a Statement of Facts, or failing in this, to get the trial judge to make up a statement of facts, citing Rule 377, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

We do not agree with this contention for the following reasons: In this case trial was to a jury, and after Plaintiff-Appellant rested, the trial court withdrew the cause from the jury and entered judgment for the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Englander Co. v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Harris v. LebowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  3. Johnson v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. Pacific Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Thomas v. TC Bateson CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API