Legal Opinion

Keefer v. Durkos

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 17, 2005No. Civ. A. 04-187JPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER

GIBSON, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Document No. 15) and accompanying Brief (Document No. 16) and the Plaintiffs Response (Document No. 17) and Brief in Opposition (Document No. 18). Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) is granted in part and denied in part.

The Court has jurisdiction over the Plaintiffs federal claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and the Plaintiffs state law claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367. Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391.

In analyzing…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Daiuto v. Evolve Guest Controls, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
  2. SKELTON v. BOROUGH OF EAST GREENVILLEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API