Legal Opinion

Kupferschmid, Inc. v. Rodeghero

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 3, 1986No. 3-85-0271PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

Plaintiff entered into an agreement with defendant Gillette for the purchase of a barn cleaner, cow pen paneling, tie stalls, clamps, thermostats and fans which were to be installed in a new metal dairy-barn to be constructed on defendant Rodeghero’s property. This property was subject to a Federal Land Bank mortgage obtained by defendants Rodeghero, Gillette and his wife, to finance construction of a new metal dairy bam. Gillette and Rodeghero previously had been involved in a dairy operation on a partnership basis and they entered into an agreement wherein Gillette would construct a new…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. R. Haas Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Springfield Amusement Park Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. B. Kreisman & Co. v. First Arlington National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Douglas Lumber Co. v. Chicago Home for IncurablesIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Fehr Construction Co. v. Postl System of Health BuildingIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  5. D. D. Kennedy, Inc. v. Lake Petersburg Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Airtite v. DPR Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  2. Airtite v. DPR Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API