Prater v. Indiana Briquetting Corp.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion
Sharp, J.'
I must respectfully dissent from the majority opinion in this case. I will not burden this opinion with citations calling for a liberal and broad construction of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, although they are basic to my position in this case.
It should also be emphasized this is not a case involving the violation of a reasonable written or printed work rule under Burns’ Ind. Stat. Ann., § 40-1208.
In addition to the evidence suggested in the majority opinion, it also is undisputed that the plant manager himself had sent Appellant’s decedent and other employees to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lasear, Inc. v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
- Holland-St. Louis Sugar Co. v. ShralukaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- In re LoperIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- United States Steel Corp. v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1967
- Wasmuth-Endicott Co. v. KarstIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.