Legal Opinion

Rakestraw v. State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 25, 1936No. 32,518PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This appeal presents for review a ruling of the trial court on a question of misjoinder in an action to recover damages for injuries sustained on or adjacent to a public highway.

*88The pertinent facts were these: In Crawford county there is a public road which runs east and west, and which is designated U. S. highway No. 160 and also as state highway No. 12. About two miles west of Pittsburg it is intersected by county highway No. 8, which runs north and south. At the southwest corner of this intersection there is a filling station. Patrons…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. City of CherryvaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. Arnold v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  3. Hurd v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  4. Minch v. WintersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Douglas v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Grantham v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. Burks v. AldridgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  3. Fitzgerald v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  4. Phillips v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  5. Clarke v. CITY OF GREERSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API