Legal Opinion
Claim of Elwood v. K-Mart Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 20, 2001PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrew Iii, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed March 24, 2000, which ruled that claimant did not voluntarily withdraw from the labor market.
In April 1992, claimant sustained a work-related injury to her lower back, which ultimately required surgical intervention in January 1996. Following her return to employment in August 1996, claimant worked as a telephone receptionist and as a cashier at a register. Claimant thereafter learned that the receptionist position would be eliminated at the end of the year and, as standing for prolonged periods of time at a register caused pain…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Camarda v. New York TelephoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Claim of Beehm v. Educational Opportunity CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Claim of Gregg v. RandazzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pittman v. ABM Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Claim of Lombardi v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Curtis v. Dale Pipery Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Claim of De Simone v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Milby v. Consolidated EdisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.