Legal Opinion

Moritz's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 24, 1913No. Appeal, No. 369PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 369, Jan. T., 1913, by Eighth National Bank of Philadelphia, from decree of O. C. Philadelphia Co., April T., 1911, No. 293, sustaining exceptions to adjudication In re Estate of Leopold Moritz, deceased.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 369, Jan. T., 1913, by Eighth National Bank of Philadelphia, from decree of O. C. Philadelphia Co., April T., 1911, No. 293, sustaining exceptions to adjudication In re Estate of Leopold Moritz, deceased. Exceptions to adjudication of Gummey, J. Lamorelle, J., filed the following opinion sustaining exceptions to the adjudication: • Whether or not the endorser of a promissory note is discharged from liability because of an agreement, made at the time of maturity, between the maker and the holder extending the time for payment is said by Mr. Justice Mercur, in Hagey v. Hill, 75 Pa.…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Tbe undisputed facts in this case appear in the opinion of the court below, sustaining the exceptions to the adjudication of the auditing judge, and on that opinion the decree is affirmed at appellant’s costs.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Yubas v. MakranskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. In Re Estate of Agnes Marie UhligSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Boyle's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API