Glaude ex rel. Stephenson v. Royal Indemnity Co.
District Court, D. Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LAGUEUX, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. At issue is whether an automobile insurance policy issued by Royal Indemnity Company (“Royal”) provides uninsured motorist coverage to plaintiff Daniel N. Glaude (“Glaude”) for injuries sustained in an automobile accident on January 29, 1995. For the reasons that follow, Glaude’s motion for summary judgment is denied, and Royal’s motion for summary judgment is granted.
I. Background
The tragic facts of this case are…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Dana Blackie v. State of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Amica Mutual Insurance v. StreickerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
- Malo v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
- Employers' Fire Insurance v. BakerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Roberge v. Travelers Property Casualty Company of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2023