Legal Opinion

Mueller v. Merz

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1964Published

1Per curiam

(on motion for rehearing). Upon rehearing, we have considered the propriety of a third person’s raising the question of the legal sufficiency of the notice of a special stockholders’ meeting under sec. 180.24, Stats.

The broad principle of corporation law involved is that defects as to notice of a stockholders’ meeting may not be taken advantage of except by the corporation itself or its shareholders. This is a principle that may be extracted from Perfex Radiator Co. v. Goetz (1923), 179 Wis. 338, 191 N. W. 755, and Lutheran T. Congregation v. St. Paul’s English E. L. Congregation (1914), 159…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Village of Brown Deer v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Lutheran Trifoldighed Congregation v. St. Paul's English Evangelical Lutheran CongregationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Perfex Radiator Co. v. GoetzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API