Legal Opinion

Schwaab v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge COHN.

This is an appeal by Charles Schwaab (Claimant) from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) to grant Schmidt Baking Company, Ine.’s (Employer) petition to terminate Claimant’s benefits and its petition to review, allowing Employer to assert a subrogation hen and obtain reimbursement from Claimant. Claimant chahenges the termination, and also argues that Employer cannot assert a subro-gation hen against Claimant’s recovery of uninsured motorist benefits from Employer’s pohcy.

Claimant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Udvari v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Greenwich Collieries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Thompson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Warner v. Continental/CNA Insurance CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hannigan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Superior Lawn Care v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Hannigan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API