Legal Opinion

Bullock v. Latham

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 23, 1964No. 28976Published

1Opinion of the Court

339 F.2d 605

65-1 USTC P 9143

Giles E. BULLOCK and Katherine D. Bullock, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Dana LATHAM, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, and E. C.

Coyle, Jr., District Director of Internal Revenue,

defendants-Appellees.

No. 256, Docket 28976.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Dec. 8, 1964.

Decided Dec. 23, 1964.

Milo Thomas, Rochester, N.Y., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Robert H. Solomon, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson; Joseph Kovner, Department of Justice; John T. Curtin, U.S. Atty., Stephen S. Joy, Asst. U.S.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bullock v. LathamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API