Legal Opinion

Sanford v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1971No. 768S113PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivan, J.

Appellant was charged with the crime of uttering a forged instrument. However, the instructions given to the jury, including a form of verdict, were all directed to the crime of forgery, and the verdict rendered by the jury was guilty of forgery “as charged in the affidavit.” Appellant was sentenced to the Indiana State Reformatory for not less than two nor more than fourteen years and fined in the sum of $10.

The crimes of forgery and uttering a forged instrument are both set out in Burns Ind. Stat., 1956 Repl., § 10-2102, which reads as follows:

“Whoever falsely makes, or assists in making,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Summers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Beyerline v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Bruce v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Gennaitte v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. McFarland v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Addis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Hobson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Maynard v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Rodriguez v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API