Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 2, 2012No. CA CR 11-857PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge.

| ^Appellant Jameko Williams was tried by a jury and found guilty of the offense of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. In this appeal, he contends 1) that there is insufficient evidence to support his conviction, 2) that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a mistrial, and 3) that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing a state trooper to give his lay opinion concerning money that was found on Williams at the time of his ai'rest. We affirm.

Trooper David Tumey testified that he came into contact with Williams while on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Kilpatrick v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Chapman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Bridges v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Plessy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Worsham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  2. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  3. Baumann v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  4. Rose v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  5. Alexander v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API