Legal Opinion

Goutermont v. Sparks

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 6, 1917No. 20,493PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Sherman district court; William S. Langmade, judge pro tem.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiff brought this action on three promissory notes given to him by the defendants. Defendant Sparks, in his answer, admitted the execution and delivery of the notes, but said that he signed them as surety only, and on the oral agreement between plaintiff Goutermont and defendant Bland and Sparks, that to secure the payment of the notes the plaintiff would take a chattel mortgage, signed by defendant Bland, on a certain printing plant; and further *432said that the plaintiff failed to take the chattel mortgage, and that by reason of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Bartholomew v. FellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Hardwick Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. DrenanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1899
  4. Myers v. FryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1885

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Talbott v. NibertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  2. Schlotthauer v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API