Legal Opinion

Miller v. Weisel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 14, 2005PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendants Susan M. Weisel and Fishkill Obstetrics and Gynecology, EC., appeal, on the ground of excessiveness, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.H.O.), entered August 22, 2003, which, upon a jury verdict awarding the plaintiff damages in the sum of $400,000 for past pain and suffering and $800,000 for future pain and suffering, is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $1,200,000.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the facts and as a matter of discretion, with costs,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Senko v. FondaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Charles v. DayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Reid v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Iovine v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Velez v. Empire Medical GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Kihl v. PfefferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Vainer v. DiSalvoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Taveras v. VegaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Morales v. Interfaith Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Nutley v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API