Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Stein

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 18, 2003No. Misc. No. 26, Sept. Term, 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

819 A.2d 372 (2003)

373 Md. 531

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

v.

Charles F. STEIN, III.

Misc. No. 26, Sept. Term, 2002.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

March 18, 2003.

Melvin Hirshman Bar Counsel and Raymond A. Hein, Assistant Bar Counsel for the Attorney Grievance of Maryland, for petitioner.

Thomas McDonough, Towson, for respondent.

Argued before BELL, C.J., RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL, BATTAGLIA and RODOWSKY (retired, specially assigned), JJ.

RAKER, Judge.

Charles F. Stein, III, respondent, drafted a will for his client providing a substantial gift to himself where the client did not…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Krischbaum v. DillonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MonfriedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API