Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. White

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 23, 1986No. 3109 and 3110PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

This case involves an appeal by the Commonwealth of an order granting the appellees’ motion to suppress. The trial court found that the appellees, Joseph Crump and Keith White, had been arrested without probable cause and that all physical evidence and statements gained as a result of the illegal arrest must be suppressed. Upon review, we find that the appellees were subjected to a reasonable investigatory detention and then properly arrested when a brief investigation led to the discovery of additional facts which established probable cause for a valid arrest. Accordingly, we…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. HicksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DanielsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. DouglassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. ElliottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API