Legal Opinion

Nash Kelvinator Sales Corp. v. Clark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 22, 1950Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: Plaintiff is a foreign corporation authorized to conduct business in this State. It claims to have a residence at its place of business in Buffalo, Erie County. Defendants both reside in Broome County. They made demand that the action be removed to Broome County on the ground that Broome County was the proper place of trial, and on plaintiff’s failure to con*1057sent, moved to change the place of trial from Brie to Broome County. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 182; Rules Civ. Prae., rule 146.) The Special Term granted the order and plaintiff appeals. It has long been established that in an action…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mills & Gibb (Inc.) v. StarinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  2. Shepard & Morse Lumber Co. v. BurleighAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. Remington & Sherman Co. v. Niagara County National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. Miller Chemical & Fertilizer Corp. v. BabcockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API