Legal Opinion

Zelenko v. Gimbel Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1936PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order denying defendant’s motion for judgment dismissing the amended complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant to answer within twenty days after service of order with notice of entry, upon payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Dore and Cohn, JJ. [158 Misc. 904.]

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Zelenko v. Gimbel Bros.New York Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wojcik v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Wolf v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Clark v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1949
  4. Kalikas v. ArtaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Walsh v. Town of CheektowagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API