Legal Opinion
Fournier v. Zickefoose
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 12, 2009No. 3:09-mj-00224PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING RE: APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (DOC. NO. 1)
JANET C. HALL, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Petitioner Michelle Ann Fournier is currently serving a 41-month sentence at the Federal Prison Camp in Danbury, Connecticut (“FPC Danbury”). She is scheduled to be released from custody on September 13, 2009. On February 6, 2009, Fournier, acting pro se, filed an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (the “Application”) alleging that the Federal Bureau of Prisons (the “BOP”) is violating her constitutional rights by not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Carlos Pelaez-Edison Carmona v. United States Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Elliott Levine v. Craig ApkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Beharry v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bautista v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Bolton v. RamosDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- Bortner v. StoverDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Brian Lockett v. Warden Caryn FlowersDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
- Brian Lockett v. Warden Caryn FlowersDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.