Legal Opinion
Suburban Land Co. v. Brown
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 5, 1921PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.
The controversy between these parties was submitted to an.arbitrator. No question of practice has been raised *167by the parties and none considered by the court. The record is imperfect as to the history of the proceeding. The case is decided as it has been presented and is not to be regarded as a precedent in procedure. The hearing in the Superior Court and the argument before us proceeded on the footing that the arbitrator intended by his award to submit certain questions of law for the determination of the court. We treat it accordingly. Ellicott v. Coffin, 106 Mass. 365. Giles v. Royal Ins.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Noyes v. NoyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Boyden v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Blanchard v. Inhabitants of BlackstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Ellicott v. CoffinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Giles v. Royal InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kneeland v. EmertonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Boylston Housing Corp. v. O'TooleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Nashua River Paper Co. v. LindsayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Matter of Barney Schogel, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Berenson v. FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.