Legal Opinion

Cook v. Robertson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 26, 2013No. A12A2268; A12A2269; A12A2506; A13A0006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Branch, Judge.

These cases require us to determine whether Georgia has properly implemented a certain asset transfer penalty dictated by the federal Medicaid statute in connection with coverage for long-term care. The difficulty is that there appear to be conflicting provisions of *797the statute pertaining to the penalty, specifically, the circumstances under which the penalty applies to annuities purchased by the Medicaid applicant or his or her spouse. One provision imposes a penalty on couples who, in a five-year, look-back period, purchase an annuity without naming the State as a remainder…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Fleming v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  5. Pruitt Corp. v. Georgia Department of Community HealthSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cook v. GloverSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  2. COOK Et Al v. GLOVERCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  3. Cook v. GloverSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  4. Cook v. GloverSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API