Legal Opinion

State v. Hunt

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 5, 1983No. 45244PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUDLOWSKI, Presiding Judge.

The central issue on this appeal is one of first impression: whether the defendant can be convicted of attempting to receive stolen property over $150.00 in value in violation of § 564.011, RSMo 1978, despite the fact that the property in question had never been stolen. We hold that factual impossibility does not preclude a conviction for attempt to receive stolen property under § 564.011, RSMo 1978. We accordingly affirm the decision of the trial court.

The facts are as follows:

On October 29, 1980, members of the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department purchased…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. SpicaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. Monroe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  3. Dille v. St. Luke's HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  4. In Re L____Supreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  5. State v. RiosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ballew v. AinsworthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. State v. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. State v. TorregrossaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. State v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API