State v. Hunt
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PUDLOWSKI, Presiding Judge.
The central issue on this appeal is one of first impression: whether the defendant can be convicted of attempting to receive stolen property over $150.00 in value in violation of § 564.011, RSMo 1978, despite the fact that the property in question had never been stolen. We hold that factual impossibility does not preclude a conviction for attempt to receive stolen property under § 564.011, RSMo 1978. We accordingly affirm the decision of the trial court.
The facts are as follows:
On October 29, 1980, members of the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department purchased…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. SpicaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Monroe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Dille v. St. Luke's HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
- In Re L____Supreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- State v. RiosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ballew v. AinsworthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. TorregrossaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.