Legal Opinion

Garfield v. Mackinney

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided August 22, 1956Published

1Opinion of the CourtMargaret Mary J. Mangan, J.

In the above-entitled action, after hearing, traverse overruled. The complaint accompanying the summons when served set forth the amount in suit. A reading of the summons and complaint showed jurisdiction in the court over the subject matter of the action. While the amount in suit was not on the face of the summons when served, the court finds that at the request of the defendant after service, the amount was inserted, the defendant thereby waiving and the plaintiff correcting the omission. (Rosenfeld v. Morales, 112 N. Y. S. 2d 211.) The plaintiff’s failure to conform the original with the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Garfield v. MackinneyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API