Legal Opinion

Garfield v. Mackinney

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided August 22, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMargaret Mary J. Mangan, J.

In the above-entitled action, after hearing, traverse overruled. Section 227-a of the Civil Practice Act authorized service of a summons upon an attorney who is representing a nonresident plaintiff in a pending action or proceeding. The commencement of the Surrogate’s proceeding by the nonresident plaintiff was a submission by her to the jurisdiction of our courts for the purpose of service of process. While the Surrogate’s proceeding was subsequently dismissed for lack of jurisdiction of subject matter, it was nevertheless begun or commenced in the literal terms of section 227-a with…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Titan Research & Development Corp. of America v. DoellerNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Dart v. FehlNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Garfield v. MackinneyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1956
  4. Hurwitz v. Bernard Associates No. Three, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API