Gordon v. Ford Motor Co.
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1DissentHaley, J.
I respectfully dissent. I would hold Code § 65.2-708(0 provides only one extension of the statute of limitations contained in Code § 65.2-708(A) per compensable injury. Since the time provided by the statute of limitations, even with the extension contained in subsection C, expired before Gordon filed his claim, I would hold Gordon’s claim time-barred.
In relevant part, Code § 65.2-708 states:
A. Upon its own motion or upon the application of any party in interest, on the ground of a change in condition, the Commission may review any award and on such review may make an award ending,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
- Meeks v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
- Earley v. LandsidleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
- Jackson v. Fidelity and Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.