Legal Opinion

Lay v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1895No. 1,531PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Randolph Circuit' Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Rein hard, J. —

The appellant was tried and convicted in the court below on a charge of removing a double gate from a certain fence around a cemetery.

The assignment of errors is that the indictment does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the appellant or charge or state a public offense or crime against him, and that the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

The indictment is in two counts. In the first count, after the caption and introductory portion, it is averred that the appellant did “unlawfully, willfully, mischievously and maliciously…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Beatty and Ritchie v. Kurtz and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. Peters v. BantaIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Nichols v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. McCool v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  5. O'Brien v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State v. FairbanksIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Merrill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Lipschitz v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. McDaniels v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API