Legal Opinion
Boks v. Charles E. Smith Management, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 17, 1982No. 81-1623PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERN, Associate Judge:
This appeal presents the question whether the trial court acted properly in dismissing appellant’s action on the basis of a praecipe of dismissal which had been executed by the appellant for herself and for the appellees, and was served upon the ap-pellees, but never filed with the court. Because we find genuine issues of material fact in this case which were improperly resolved on the motion to dismiss, we reverse.
I
This is a personal injury action brought pro se by the appellant, Tatiana Boks, for damages allegedly resulting from a malfunction of the air conditioning…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Nader v. De ToledanoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Teodore Dorotee Autera v. Manuel Dudley Robinson, Anthony C. Autera v. Manuel Dudley RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Gene M. Oswalt Et Vir v. Scripto, Inc., Defendant-Third Party v. Tokai-Seiki Kk, a Japanese Corporation, Defendant-Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Howard v. Riggs National BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Pipeliners Local Union No. 798, Tulsa, Oklahoma, and A. Leroy Jones v. Fred H. EllerdCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dyer v. BilaalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Launay v. Launay, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Totalplan Corp. of America v. ColborneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Reynolds v. Gateway Georgetown Condominium Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Launay v. Launay, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.