Legal Opinion · Dissent

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Commercial Office Products Company

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 23, 1986No. 85-2224Published

1DissentMcKAY, Circuit Judge

The court correctly observes that:

The federal courts have continued to struggle with the time limitations for filing a Title VII charge in deferral states. The frequency with which the courts confront this issue implies that complainants in deferral states who have failed to file a charge within 180 days after the alleged unlawful employment practice occurred are confused with respect to the applicable time limitations.

Maj.Op. at 585. The court also recognizes that claimants, too, often experience confusion as to the applicable time limitations. Id. at 585. The frequent litigation and the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ephraim Isaac v. Harvard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  3. Thompson v. International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace WorkersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
  4. Rocky Mountain Oil And Gas Association v. James G. WattCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  5. Cattell v. Bob Frensley Ford, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API