Legal Opinion
Gonzalez v. Apfel
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 25, 1999No. 92 Civ. 7997 (JES)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), plaintiff Alfred Gonzalez (“Gonzalez”) brings this action challenging the final determination of defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) that he was not disabled prior to June 1, 1989, and thus not entitled to Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) disability benefits at any time prior to that date. Pursuant to Rule 12(c), Fed. R.Civ.P., the parties bring cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motion is…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Elmer G. Berry v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- George MONGEUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gavin, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Martinez Jr v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Peets-Doody v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2024
- Romero v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Salerno v. Nancy BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.