Legal Opinion

Gutrich v. LaPlante

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1997No. 95CA0742PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge NEY.

In this legal malpractice action, plaintiffs, Thomas R. and Peggy Gutrich, appeal the judgment entered in favor of respondents, Gary P. LaPlante, individually (individual respondent) and Gary P. LaPlante, P.C. (corporate respondent). We affirm.

Following a jury trial in August 1994, plaintiffs obtained a judgment on their claim of neghgence against the law firm of Cogs-well and Wehrle, a general partnership (partnership). The trial court entered judgment in favor of plaintiffs in the amount of $321,-116.19 in compensatory damages, $50,000 in punitive damages, and $6 for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Lawrence G. EmpeyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  2. Womack v. GrandbushSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Wells Plaza Ltd. PartnershipColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Teem PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gutrich v. Cogswell & WehrleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API