Legal Opinion

Coward v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 14, 2016No. 14-16378Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The memorandum disposition filed August 15, 2016, is hereby amended. An amended disposition is filed concurrently with this order.

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Graber and McKeown have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Peterson declines to make a recommendation.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en bane…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Bly-Magee v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Dale Bozzio v. Emi Group LtdCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API