Legal Opinion
Park South Tenants Corp. v. 200 Central Park South Associates, L.P.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 17, 1990No. 89 Civ. 8251 (WCC)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Park South Tenants Corporation brings this claim for damages, pursuant to Section 3607 of the Condominium and Cooperative Protection and Abuse Relief Act of 1980 (the “Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq, against defendants 200 Central Park South Associates (the “Sponsor”) and Bernard Spitzer, Jack Lipman and Melvin D. Lip-man, as individuals and as directors of plaintiff (collectively, the “Directors”). Plaintiff further bases its claim for damages on defendants’ alleged breach of their fiduciary duty to plaintiff. This action is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Knight v. U.S. Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Park South Tenants Corporation v. 200 Central Park South Associates, L.P., Bernard Spitzer, Jack Lipman, and Melvin D. LipmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Park South Tenants Corp. v. 200 Central Park South Associates, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Darnet Realty Associates, LLC v. 136 East 56th Street Owners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Barnan Associates v. 196 Owner's Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Board of Managers of the Charles House Condominium v. Infinity Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.