Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Stolzle

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 15, 2013No. 2013-B-1176Published

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

2Per curiam

h This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Frederick A. Stolzle, Jr., an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana but currently on interim suspension based upon a joint petition filed by the parties filed in April 2009. In re: Stolzle, 09-0934 (La.4/29/09), 7 So.3d 660.

PRIOR DISCIPLINARY HISTORY

Before we address the current charges, we find it helpful to review respondent’s prior disciplinary history. Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in Louisiana in 1978. In…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  4. In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. In Re BanksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API