In Re Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics Opinion 705
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
In this appeal, we must determine whether a provision of the New Jersey Conflicts of Interest Law (Act), N.J.S.A. 52:13D-12 to -27, must yield to a conflicting Rule of Professional Conduct (RPC). Specifically, the question presented is whether attorneys formerly employed by the State are subject to N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17 when the Act’s post-employment restrictions are more stringent than the directives of RPC 1.11(c).
In response to an attorney inquiry, the Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics (ACPE) concluded that, absent a decision by this Court to defer to the Legislature, RPC 1.11 “should…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Commission of InvestigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Winberry v. SalisburySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- David v. Vesta Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Knight v. City of MargateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- McKeown-Brand v. Trump Castle Hotel & CasinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. James Buckner (074390)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
- Guaman v. VelezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- Henebema v. South Jersey Transportation AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- State Troopers Non-Commissioned Officers Ass'n v. New JerseyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Anchor Law Firm, Pllc v. the State of New JerseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.