Legal Opinion

In Re Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics Opinion 705

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 19, 2007PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal, we must determine whether a provision of the New Jersey Conflicts of Interest Law (Act), N.J.S.A. 52:13D-12 to -27, must yield to a conflicting Rule of Professional Conduct (RPC). Specifically, the question presented is whether attorneys formerly employed by the State are subject to N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17 when the Act’s post-employment restrictions are more stringent than the directives of RPC 1.11(c).

In response to an attorney inquiry, the Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics (ACPE) concluded that, absent a decision by this Court to defer to the Legislature, RPC 1.11 “should…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Commission of InvestigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Winberry v. SalisburySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  3. David v. Vesta Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  4. Knight v. City of MargateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. McKeown-Brand v. Trump Castle Hotel & CasinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. James Buckner (074390)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  2. Guaman v. VelezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
  3. Henebema v. South Jersey Transportation AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
  4. State Troopers Non-Commissioned Officers Ass'n v. New JerseyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
  5. Anchor Law Firm, Pllc v. the State of New JerseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API